SGA Growth — Marketing Performance Audit ← Portfolio Index · Q1 2026 · Confidential · noindex

Oakwood Smiles

https://www.oakwoodsmiles.com/

Production softened -6.3% YoY ($905,955 → $849,127). During the same window, new patient intake declined by 40 and leakage held steady. The practice scorecard shows 8 of 19 metrics passing, with 4 fails concentrated in schedule management and referral program. The analysis below frames where collaborative opportunities exist rather than assigning root cause — the team can use these numbers as a shared starting point for the next operating rhythm review.

1. Practice Marketing Scorecard

8Passing
4Failing
7Data Gaps
67%Pass Rate (of measurable)
CategoryMetricCurrent ValueBenchmarkResult
Patient AcquisitionAvg New Patients / Month (last 90d)32.3≥ 30Pass
NP Call Conversion %N/A — Not on PeerLogic≥ 55%N/A
Missed Call %N/A — Not on PeerLogic≤ 18%N/A
3rd Next Available NP ApptN/A — Modento link not provided≤ 7 daysN/A
Patient RetentionUnscheduled Active Patients (YoY)1,158 vs 1,329Decrease YOYPass
Unscheduled $$ Opportunity (YoY)$1,333,275 vs $1,505,159Decrease YOYPass
NP Hygiene Re-Appointment %50.5%≥ 40%Pass
Hygiene Re-Appointment %92.7%≥ 85%Pass
Pre-Appointment %62%≥ 60%Pass
Schedule ManagementAppointments Completed (YoY)1,694 vs 1,778Increase YOYFail
No-Shows %5.9%≤ 5%Fail
Cancellations %16.4%≤ 5%Fail
Online ReputationGoogle Reviews (Total)1,350≥ 300Pass
Google Reviews (Last 30 Days)N/A — requires Swell/GBP API≥ 10N/A
Google Star Rating5.0≥ 4.5Pass
Google 5-Star %N/A — requires Swell≥ 90%N/A
Yelp Reviews (Total)N/A — not in current scan≥ 20N/A
Yelp Star RatingN/A — not in current scan≥ 4.0N/A
Referral ProgramTracking Referral Source (Missing %)32% missing< 20% missingFail

2. Production & Revenue Overview

Production Gross
$849,127
▼ $-56,829 (-6.3%)
New Patients
97
▼ -40 (-29.2%)
Case $ Accepted %
47.1%
▲ +9.3pp (+24.6%)
Visits / Working Day
28.03
▼ -5 (-14.3%)
MetricQ1 2025Q1 2026YoY Δ
Production Gross$905,955$849,127▼ $-56,829 (-6.3%)
Production Scheduled$753,775$671,810▼ $-81,965 (-10.9%)
Annual Patient Value$1,133$1,151▲ +$19 (+1.7%)
Visits Per Working Day32.7228.03▼ -5 (-14.3%)

3. New Patient Acquisition & Case Acceptance

MetricQ1 2025Q1 2026YoY Δ
New Patients13797▼ -40 (-29.2%)
New Patients / Working Day2.581.67▼ -1 (-35.3%)
Case Acceptance %64.0%71.2%▲ +7.2pp (+11.3%)
NP Case Acceptance %54.9%76.0%▲ +21.1pp (+38.4%)
Case $ Presented$1,472,278$1,168,917▼ $-303,361 (-20.6%)
Case $ Accepted$555,838$550,143▼ $-5,695 (-1.0%)
Case $ Accepted %37.8%47.1%▲ +9.3pp (+24.6%)

4. Same-Day Treatment & Clinical Performance

MetricQ1 2025Q1 2026YoY Δ
Same-Day Hygiene $$6,559$11,163▲ +$4,604 (+70.2%)
Same-Day Restorative $$446,996$466,996▲ +$20,000 (+4.5%)
Case Diagnosed % — Hygiene1.0%2.4%▲ +1.4pp (+140.0%)
Case Diagnosed % — Restorative34.7%39.6%▲ +4.9pp (+14.1%)

5. Patient Volume & Appointment Health

MetricQ1 2025Q1 2026YoY Δ
Active Hygiene Patients2,7042,604▼ -100 (-3.7%)
Unscheduled Active Patients1,3291,158▼ -171 (-12.9%)
Unscheduled $ Opportunity$1,505,159$1,333,275▼ $-171,884 (-11.4%)
Appointments Completed1,7781,694▼ -84 (-4.7%)
Cancellations %19.1%16.4%▼ -2.7pp (-14.1%)
No-Shows %2.2%5.9%▲ +3.7pp (+168.2%)
Pre-Appointment %59.0%62.0%▲ +3.0pp (+5.1%)

6. Appointment Confirmation & Patient Recapture

MetricQ1 2025Q1 2026YoY Δ
DI Confirmed %19.2%26.0%▲ +6.8pp (+35.4%)
NP Hygiene Re-Appt %46.7%50.5%▲ +3.8pp (+8.1%)
Hygiene Re-Appt %92.9%92.7%▼ -0.2pp (-0.2%)
Recaptured Patients6042▼ -18 (-30.0%)
Patients Net Growth-73-73▲ +0 (+0.0%)

7. Operational Efficiency

Online Scheduling Adoption0.0%
Hygiene→Restorative Handoff Ratio0.48
NP Close Rate (Cases)76.0%
Avg Production / Visit$501
Patient Attrition212 (152.5%)

Call Conversion (PeerLogic Q1 2026)

NP Call Conversion
Existing Patient Conversion
Missed Call %
Top Reason Not Booked
NotesIn Onboarding

Online Reputation (Google Business Profile)

Rating5 ★
Review Count1,350
Address4038 Mundy Mill Rd, Oakwood, GA 30566, USA
Phone(770) 534-4292
Primary Categorydentist

Data Hygiene & Tracking Gaps

Referral Source Attribution: 32% of new patients (31 of 97) are missing referral source. This exceeds the 20% threshold and blocks reliable marketing ROI attribution. Without this data, we cannot tell which channels are producing new patients.

Production Waterfall Analysis (Q1 2025 → Q1 2026)

Bridges prior-period production to current-period production by attributing the change to specific drivers. Green = gained production; Red = lost production.

$905,955 $-27,212 +$108,709 +$24,604 $-8,491 $-117,544 $-36,895 $849,127PriorProdNewPatientVolumeCaseAcceptanceSame-DayTreatmentAppointmentLeakageScheduleUtilizationOther/UnattributedCurrentProd
DriverImpactNote
New Patient Volume$-27,212-40 NP × $680 avg restorative/exam
Case Acceptance+$108,709Δ 9.3% × $1,168,917 presented
Same-Day Treatment+$24,604Current $478,159 − prior $453,555
Appointment Leakage$-8,491Prior 21.3% → current 22.3% (worsened)
Schedule Utilization$-117,544VPWD Δ -4.69 × 50 days × $501/visit
Other / Unattributed$-36,895Residual: fee schedule, payer mix, seasonality, provider changes
Net Change$-56,829Q1 2025 → Q1 2026

Action Plan — Organized by Support Team

Marketing

  1. Reactivation campaign for unscheduled active patients — Pull the 6+ month overdue list from Dental Intel Analytics (not Engagement — Engagement only reaches patients with future appointments). This practice shows 1,158 unscheduled active patients representing $1,333,275 in opportunity.
    Owner: Growth team + Office Manager  •  DI Workflow: Analytics → Unscheduled Active Patients → export → manual outreach assignment  •  Impact: Recovering even 10% of dollar opportunity = $133,327
  2. Online scheduling adoption lift — Only 0.0% of NPs booked online. Audit Modento integration + website CTA visibility. Patients who can't find a "Book Now" button often don't call either.
    Owner: Marketing + Web  •  DI Workflow: N/A — web analytics + Modento config  •  Impact: Captures after-hours + call-shy prospects

Operations

  1. 48-hour appointment confirmation protocol — Combined cancel + no-show rate is 22.3% (benchmark ≤10%). Use Engagement TouchPoint + manual phone backup + Park Column for unconfirmed slots.
    Owner: Office Manager  •  DI Workflow: Engagement → TouchPoint rules + daily morning-huddle confirmation report  •  Impact: Moving to 8% leakage recovers ~$121,425

Office Manager

  1. Referral source entry compliance — 32% of new patients are missing referral source attribution. This blocks all marketing ROI analysis — we can't tell what is working. Mandate entry at check-in + daily audit.
    Owner: Office Manager  •  DI Workflow: DI PMS integration check + front desk training  •  Impact: Unblocks marketing spend attribution

Doctor

  1. Peer review of case presentation + schedule availability — Production softened -6.3% YoY. Review the waterfall drivers together — the largest negative driver is where collaboration will unlock the most dollars.
    Owner: Doctor + ROD  •  DI Workflow: Analytics → Production breakdown + VPWD trend  •  Impact: Recovers soft quarter via targeted lever

Executive

  1. PeerLogic onboarding — This practice is not on PeerLogic, so we have no call-conversion data. Per Matt/Nathan strategy, get all practices onto PeerLogic — without it we cannot diagnose the front-desk funnel.
    Owner: ROD + IT  •  DI Workflow: N/A — vendor onboarding  •  Impact: Unblocks call-funnel diagnosis
  2. Strategic context (from Priority List review) — Elevated priority. Strong conversion (Patient Prism data), operationally solid. Flat-to-down NP flow despite pulling other levers. Most likely candidate for increased marketing spend in this cohort.
    Owner: ROD + Growth  •  DI Workflow: N/A  •  Impact: Alignment on sequencing
AI Analysis Disclaimer: This report was generated by an AI system combining Dental Intel benchmarks, PeerLogic call data, and Google Business Profile signals. AI systems in dentistry are estimated at ~40% raw accuracy for clinical interpretation — every finding should be validated by the Market Manager, ROD, and Doctor before action is taken. Numbers are correct per the source CSVs; interpretations and recommended actions are directional, not prescriptive.